AAC Home
2010 Featured Speakers
2010 Presentations
2010 Conference Schedule
Travel and Accommodations
Sponsorship and Exhibition
Call for Proposals
AAC Registration
About the AAC
Contact Us
AAC Partner Organizations
AAC Partner Log-in
Past NC State Undergraduate Assessment Symposia
Visiting Raleigh
|
|
| |
|
New schedules and session descriptions will be posted in Spring 2012. Please check back for more details.
|
| |
|
|
| |
GS 1 Sunday, April 11
1:00-2:15 PM |
Keynote Address: Assessment Officers as Agents of Change |
| Randy Swing, Association for Institutional Research |
Assessment and institutional research officers have proven to be effective technicians capable of measuring an array of postsecondary education outcomes. They have not always been as effective in assuring that the academy used those results for improvement.
Part of the solution must be re-thinking the role of assessment and IR officers as change agents who engage in the entire process of organizational change - not just in providing data and analysis. Serving as a change agent in higher education requires skills that do not necessarily rely on formal power. Successful change agents must participate in focusing campus attention, building knowledge, framing issues, understanding options, and undertaking solutions. |
|
GS 2 Monday, April 12
9:00-10:15 AM |
Monday Morning Plenary Address: Infrastructure for Sustainable Assessment |
| Mary J. Allen, California State University - Bakersfield |
Assessment is an essential component of learning-centered institutions, but accreditors often find that campus assessment efforts wax and wane with the accreditation cycle. We will explore what it means to be learning-centered and models for developing an infrastructure to support meaningful, manageable, sustainable assessment.
Book Drawing: Enter to win a free book of your choice from the Conference bookstore! Tickets will be distributed and drawn before the start of the plenary. Must be present to win. |
|
GS 3 Monday, April 12
12:30-1:45 PM |
Monday Afternoon Plenary Address: Show Me the Learning: What Matters in College? |
| Terrel Rhodes, Association of American Colleges and Universities |
Employers and faculty agree on what students need to know for success; we know what pedagogies and approaches enhance student learning in and out of the classroom; and we have expertise and technology to communicate with each other. Now is the time to establish campus-based, faculty-led learning as the standard for excellence in learning.
|
|
|
All Pre-Conference Workshops run concurrently from 9:00 AM - 12:15 PM on Sunday, April 11, 2010.
Conference registration is required to attend these workshops, and all participants must pre-register. A registration fee of $20 applies to these workshops, which includes continental breakfast and lunch.
PCW 1 Sunday, April 11
9:00 AM-12:15 PM |
Beyond Survey Design 101 - Kicking Your Survey Efforts Up Another Notch |
| Ted Elling, University of North Carolina - Charlotte, and Carrie Zelna, NC State University |
Frustrated with getting only minimal benefits from your existing surveys? Come to this hands-on workshop and learn much more than just basic survey design tips.
The presenters will cover topics such as using intelligent demographics to reduce survey real estate and user fatigue, using on-line datasets to enable multiple stakeholder research, integrating surveys with other datasets to explore areas in concert with other available data such as retention and academic performance, determining the true project scope at the front end of the process to maximize stakeholder involvement, employing advanced data analysis techniques that enable the examination of qualitative data in a qualitative fashion, and much, much more. From the concepts presented in the workshop, participants will have the opportunity to flesh out and receive group feedback on new or enhanced survey ideas.
While many examples will be from within student affairs areas, the concepts presented are definitely transferable to other university domains. Given the opportunity to begin designing new survey ideas on the spot, this workshop encourages team involvement so feel free to bring a few colleagues with you.
Note: you do not need to be an "assessment geek" to enjoy and benefit from this session! |
|
PCW 2 Sunday, April 11
9:00 AM-12:15 PM |
Designing Service-Learning with Assessment in Mind |
| Patti Clayton, Curricular Engagement |
Service-learning is a "high impact pedagogy," with potentially significant outcomes not only for students but also for faculty, educational institutions, community organizations, community members, and the range of partnerships at its heart. Intentional design and a scholarly, improvement-oriented approach are key to producing and assessing both processes and outcomes.
In this session we will explore a precise yet flexible conceptualization of service-learning that can guide customized design and assessment of the pedagogy. We will identify the types of outcomes at stake for the full range of constituents and examine research-grounded tools that can support the design of critical reflection and partnerships with assessment in mind.
|
|
PCW 3
Sunday, April 11
9:00 AM-12:15 PM |
Assessing and Improving Writing and Critical Thinking |
| Terri Flateby, T.L. Flateby and Associates |
Workshop participants will explore the range of options for evaluating and improving writing and critical thinking skills which have an internal institutional focus and will satisfy accreditation demands.
Consistent with any assessment plan, in addition to determining the purpose of assessment (summative, formative, or both), outcome statements first must be specifically defined. Only then can the appropriate measurement tool(s) - whether a test or rubric - be selected or developed.
Participants will be guided through activities that effectively respond to internal needs and meet external demands to successfully measure and improve students' writing and critical thinking.
|
|
PCW 4
Sunday, April 11
9:00 AM-12:15 PM |
Assessment 101: A Beginner's Guide |
| Mike Carter, NC State University |
This workshop is an introduction to outcomes-based assessment and planning with a focus on assesing academic programs. It is intended primarily for people who are newcomers to outcomes assessment.
By the end of the workshop, participants should be able to work with faculty to help them create program outcomes, generate assessment plans, implement assessment plans, and report assessment results. |
|
PCW 5
Sunday, April 11
9:00 AM-12:15 PM |
The Use of Rubrics for Assessment, Grading, and Encouraging Student Learning |
| Mary J. Allen, California State University - Bakersfield |
Rubrics are routinely used to guide the assessment of student learning, but they also can be effective tools for grading and improving learning. Participants in this interactive session will consider ways to develop rubrics; integrate them into assessment plans; and utilize them in the classroom to expedite grading, provide formative feedback, and encourage learning. |
|
|
IPEDS
Sunday, April 11
9:00 AM-12:15 PM
2:30-6:00 PM |
|
Mr. J. Keith Brown,
Associate Vice President for Research and Performance Management, North Carolina Community College System Ms. Sandra L. Kinney, Research Manager, Technical College System of Georgia |
The IPEDS workshop has two modules, which may be attended separately or as a unit. Module I (Data and Benchmarking) is on Sunday morning (4.11.10) and Module II (Special Topics) is in the afternoon. NOTE: Participants must bring a MAC or PC laptop with wireless capability to the IPEDS Workshops.
Data and Benchmarking: Supporting Decision Making and Institutional Effectiveness - Module 1 (9:00 AM - 12:15 PM)
introduces the fundamentals of creating benchmarks to measure institutional effectiveness. The module provides an overview of the types of comparison groups that can be constructed using IPEDS data, with examples of appropriate use. Participants will use actual data from the IPEDS surveys, including the IPEDS Data Feedback Report and Executive Peer Tool. Exercises and resources will demonstrate processes to establish key performance indicators and identify variables to refine comparison groups.
NOTE: Participants must bring a MAC or PC laptop with wireless capability to this workshop.
Special Topics - Module 2 (2:30 PM - 6:00 PM)
This module includes information on the new race/ethnicity categories, the Net Price Calculator, the Data Center, CIP Codes, and Student Financial Assistance.
NOTE: Participants must bring a MAC or PC laptop with wireless capability to this workshop.
AAC registration is not required to attend the IPEDS workshop, but all participants must pre-register. There is no charge for these workshops.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XCS 1 Sunday, April 11 2:45-4:15 PM |
Assessing Co-Curricular Activities |
| Ephraim Schechter, www.higheredassessment.com |
Co-curricular outcomes can include course-related learning, student development, and general education skills and dispositions. Assessment strategies depend on what activities your institution considers co-curricular, how they are related to your curriculum, and what you want assessment to accomplish.
The session looks at these issues and provides examples and resources that you can use to explore the topic in more detail after the conference. You will be able to share experiences with other participants and to brainstorm approaches for your own campus.
|
|
XCS 2
Sunday, April 11
2:45-4:45 PM |
Articulating and Assessing Intercultural Competence in Experiential Education |
| Patti Clayton, Curricular Engagement, and Darla Deardorff, Duke University |
Diversity awareness. Global citizenship. Cross-cultural understanding.
These and other learning goals fall under the general heading of intercultural competence, and they are among the most pressing priorities of higher education. To cultivate and assess such outcomes, it is important to define them carefully, in a way that is customized to particular contexts while also informed by an expanding set of models and promising practices.
In this interactive hands-on workshop, we will explore definitions of intercultural competence and examine ways in which intercultural learning outcomes can be articulated and assessed across the range of approaches to experiential education. This workshop will serve as an introduction to intercultural learning and assessment.
|
|
XCS 3
Sunday, April 11
4:30-6:00 PM |
Course and Curriculum Alignment |
| Mary J. Allen, California State University - Bakersfield |
It is reasonable to expect students to master our learning outcomes if they experience courses and curricula that are well-aligned with them. Participants in this interactive session will explore curriculum maps and the characteristics of well-aligned curricula and will consider how well their own courses and programs meet these expectations.
|
|
XCS 4
Monday, April 12
2:45-4:15 PM |
Student Work and Valid Assessment for Learning: Changing the Metrics We Use |
| Terrel Rhodes, Association of American Colleges and Universities |
Participants will learn about using the VALUE rubrics, e-portfolios and methods for reporting assessment results that are part of regular courses and co-curricular activities that can be used for formative and summative purposes. Participants will be able to score student work using rubrics and view student portfolios as part of the workshop. By embedding these practices in the curriculum and co-curriculum, workloads do not have to be increased while student abilities to self-assess can be strengthened.
|
|
|
SCS 1
Sunday, April 11
2:30-3:30 PM |
Using E-Portfolios to support accountable and sustainable change for 21st century teacher education programs |
John Fischetti, University of North Carolina - Wilmington, and Ben Coulter, TaskStream
As a way to assess the attainment of professional standards, North Carolina adopted evidences in a uniform rubric for use in all teacher education programs across the state. This presentation will highlight the North Carolina TaskStream User Group (a voluntary state-wide consortium of teacher education programs) and will describe use of the Learning Achievement Tools (LAT) as a means for candidates to develop evidence-based electronic portfolios, have those assessed in TaskStream by faculty, and ultimately submit evidence/portfolio samples and assessment reports electronically to the Department of Public Instruction, largely replacing the traditional campus visit component of accreditation/state program review. |
| |
SCS 2
Sunday, April 11
3:45-4:45 PM |
Student Learning Outcomes and the End of Assessment |
David Shupe, eLumen Collaborative
Nine years after Peter Ewell reset the terms for outcomes assessment in "Accreditation and Student Learning Outcomes: A Proposed Point of Departure," the point of arrival is now clear. Assessment, understood as extra activities, will end when colleges and universities define each degree as a set of expected learning outcomes and track each student's progress as a developing set of actual learning outcomes. |
| |
SCS 3
Monday, April 12
10:30-11:30 AM |
Mapping: A Powerful Collaboration Tool |
Deb Leeper, WEAVEonline How can mapping facilitate collaboration? The tool can be used to develop new curricula, programs, and services; to see how core general education outcomes/objectives are addressed in the major; to determine where there are gaps in learning opportunities; and to track the types and suitability of assessments used across the curriculum. Discover how you can use mapping to take teaching, learning, and service discussions to a new level through mapping.
|
| |
SCS 4 / XCS 5
Monday, April 12
2:45 - 4:15 PM |
Creating and Implementing a Culture of Assessment Across your Campus |
Ramelle Riley , LiveText
With increased attention on assessment and accountability, many institutions are challenged by the task of creating an integrated plan to generate, collect, and use assessment data to inform decisions and make continuous improvements. During this session's sharing of lessons learned and firsthand cases, attendees can expect a forum for best-practice assessment methodology and idea exchange. The audience for this session includes university administrators - deans, provosts, presidents - assessment directors/coordinators, institutional research personnel, and faculty for two-year and four-year institutions.
|
|
|
|