Department of Mathematics and Computer
Science
Oral Communication Rubric for Computer Science Thesis Presentations
Introduction
|
|
Excellent |
Good |
Fair |
Poor |
|
Introduced main topic
clearly |
|
|
|
|
|
Outlined major points of
the talk |
|
|
|
|
|
Related topic to audience |
|
|
|
|
Body
|
|
Excellent |
Good |
Fair |
Poor |
|
Presented challenging
concepts in the field of study |
|
|
|
|
|
Transitioned smoothly
between ideas, developing connections between concepts |
|
|
|
|
|
Used terminology
appropriately |
|
|
|
|
|
Used sound analytical
reasoning to develop topic
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communicated breadth and/or
depth of topic |
|
|
|
|
Conclusion
|
|
Excellent |
Good |
Fair |
Poor |
|
Summarized major ideas of
the talk |
|
|
|
|
|
Reinforced central point of
talk |
|
|
|
|
|
Delivered effective closure
|
|
|
|
|
Delivery
|
|
Excellent |
Good |
Fair |
Poor |
|
Organized talk in a clear,
easy-to-follow manner |
|
|
|
|
|
Used clear and concise
language |
|
|
|
|
|
Maintained eye contact |
|
|
|
|
|
Articulated words clearly |
|
|
|
|
|
Used visual aids effectively |
|
|
|
|
|
Answered questions that
were posed effectively |
|
|
|
|
|
Completed talk within an
appropriate time frame |
|
|
|
|
1.
Name two
strengths of this presentation.
2.
Name two areas in
which the speaker could have improved the presentation.